Drawing for DIET DELIGHT

USPTO serial 78461625

DIET DELIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIET DELIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey J. Schwartz

JEFFREY J SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ LAW FIRM PC6100 FAIRVIEW RD STE 1135CHARLOTTE, NC 28210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed nuts, candied nuts, dried fruits, snack mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts and dried fruitsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 15, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 26, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Oct 27, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 8, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Oct 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance