Drawing for ROSEN

USPTO serial 78462028

ROSEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROSEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Butler, Esq.

JEFFREY M BUTLER ESQ KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical, electronic, optical and mechanical devices to determine the geographical coordinates of pipelines, utilizing marine, photo, movie, right-of-way, rescue, training, optical, survey, surveillance, scientific methods; Electrical, electronic, optical, and mechanical devices for the location of cleaning and inspection machines in a pipeline, in particular, by low-frequency signals or magnetic signals; Electrical, electronic, optical and mechanical devices to determine the geometry of pipelines of all types; Electrical, electronic, optical and mechanical devices for measuring the free span and change in the weight-lining of an off-shore pipeline; Electrical, electronic, optical, magnetic, acoustic and mechanical devices for examining metal loss and cracks in pipelines, in particular on the inner and outer pipe wall; Electrical, electronic, optical, magnetic, acoustic and mechanical devices for the inspection and monitoring of storage tanks, in particular for inspection of the tank bottom and the outer tank shell; Electrical, electronic, optical, magnetic, acoustic and mechanical devices for inspection of smaller diameter pipelines in particular high-pressure steel pipes; Electrical, electronic, optical, magnetic, acoustic and mechanical devices for recording and playback of audio and visual information, in particular transmitted by or to a pipeline inspection device from the inside of the pipeline or the outside of the pipeline; microprocessors, microcontrollers, data-acquisition devices, and computers for detecting and evaluating the inspection data of pipelines of all types as well as microprocessor, microcontroller data acquisition devices and computer programs for this purpose, and computer programs for evaluation of the inspection data of pipelines of all types, and computer programs for storing and administering the inspection data of pipelines of all types; data carriers, such as volatile and non-volatile storage mediums, in particular with data and with computer programs for evaluating the inspection data of pipelines of all types, as well as computer programs for storing and administering the inspection data of pipelines of all types.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 10, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 7, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance