USPTO serial 78464913
GIRL TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIRL TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna W. Manville
ANNA W MANVILLE IP DOCKETINGARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 12TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | HOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTS, CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS, JEWELRY; FOOTWEAR ADORNMENTS, NAMELY, SHOE TAGS, SHOE BADGES, SHOE DECALS AND SHOE PATCHES MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS, PRECIOUS STONES, SEMI-PRECIOUS METALS AND SEMI-PRECIOUS STONES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING NAMELY, TOPS, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, PANTS, SUITS, JEANS, OVERALLS, VESTS, JACKETS, COATS, CAPES, WRAPS, SCARVES, HATS, CAPS, VISORS, GLOVES, MITTS, MUFFS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, GOWNS, PONCHOS, RAIN RESISTANT JACKETS, RAIN RESISTANT PONCHOS, SWEATERS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, SHORTS, SKORTS, BATHING SUITS, BEACH COVER UPS; UNDERWEAR AND LINGERIE, NAMELY, PYJAMAS, PYJAMA BOTTOMS, PYJAMA TOPS, NIGHTGOWNS, BOXER SHORTS, ROBES, BRASSIERES, PANTIES, CAMISOLES AND SLIPS; FOOTWEAR; SOCKS AND HOSIERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | FOOTWEAR ADORNMENTS, NAMELY SHOE TAGS, SHOE BADGES, SHOE DECALS AND SHOE PATCHES NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS; FOOTWEAR ADORNMENTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY SHOE TAGS, SHOE BADGES, SHOE DECALS AND SHOE PATCHES MADE OF SHELL, BONE, PEARL, MOTHER-OF-PEARL AND THEIR SUBSTITUTES, PLASTIC; FOOTWEAR ADORNMENTS NAMELY SHOE ORNAMENTS NOT MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; BOOTLACES AND SHOELACES; HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HAIR PINS AND BARRETTES; HAIR ORNAMENTS, NAMELY, HAIR COMBS, HAIR CLIPS, PONYTAIL HOLDERS AND HAIR BANDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |