USPTO serial 78468325
ACTIVEGRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACTIVEGRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
PALO ALTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. August
Brett A. August Pattishall McAuliffe Newbury Hilliard & Geraldson311 S. Wacker DriveSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROGRAMMING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE DEPLOYMENT OF ENTERPRISE PLATFORMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING GRID COMPUTING APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MODELING, DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF INTRANET, EXTRANET, AND COMMERCIAL WEBSITES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |