USPTO serial 78469347
CITY EYES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITY EYES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey N. Aldous
JEFFREY N ALDOUS LEEFE, GIBBS, SULLIVAN, DUPRE & ALDOUS4262 IMPERIAL WAYPROVO, UT 84604-5327UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely preparations for the eyes, namely, eye creams, gels and lotions; eye make-up and eye make-up remover; eye pencils; eye liner; eye liner pencils; eye shadow; eyebrow pencils; mascara; non-medicated eye treatment preparations; non-medicated skin treatment preparations; non-medicated anti-aging treatment preparations; non-medicated wrinkle treatment preparations; non-medicated collagen eye treatment preparations; non-medicated scar treatment preparations; and non-medicated peptide eye treatment preparations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |