Drawing for FLETCHER CHALLENGE

USPTO serial 78469829

FLETCHER CHALLENGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLETCHER CHALLENGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET ST # 30SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Processed timber products and lumber, namely better, shop and cutting grade lumber; timber products, namely, manufactured, sawn, worked, semi-worked, rough sawn, gauged, and dried timber; wood veneer, plywood and laminated wood; building materials incorporating timber, namely, logs, floor and ceiling panels, shared timber; floor panels and wall panels not of metal, wood paneling, wall boards, finger joint studs, wood moldings used for building constructionACTIVE
020Wooden furniture and parts thereforeACTIVE
031Timber products, namely, undressed and un-sawn timber; wood chips for the manufacture of wood pulp, raw bark; forestry products, namely, unprocessed logs and live trees for use in forestryACTIVE
035Retail store and wholesale store services featuring lumber, timber wood products and products incorporating wood and building materials; business consultation and advisory services relating to the building and construction industriesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 9, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 21, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 20, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED
Oct 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance