USPTO serial 78474623
BHAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BHAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Ann Gregory
JULIE ANN GREGORY MIDDLETON REUTLINGER2500 BROWN WILLIAMSON TWRLOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair styling products, namely, gels, lotions, waxes, mousse, and sprays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |