USPTO serial 78475908
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randall M. Cutler
RANDALL M. CUTLER RANDALL M CUTLER ATTORNEY AT LAW590 MADISON AVENUE21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's apparel, namely, shirts, t-shirts, polo shirts, shorts, pants, swimsuits, jeans, overalls, sweaters, vests, tops, blouses, skirts, coats, socks, belts; workout gear, namely, warm-up suits, sweat-suits, sweat shorts, jogging suits, sweat bands, tank tops, track pants, jerseys, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sports tops, sports shorts, sports suits, sports jackets, headbands; sleepwear, hats, caps, gloves and scarves; outerwear in all fabrications namely, cloth, denim, fleece, leather and suede jackets; footwear namely shoes, sneakers, sandals and boots | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |