Drawing for POST-PASSIVATION

USPTO serial 78476212

POST-PASSIVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARTZOG, WOODROW
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POST-PASSIVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Ackerman

STEPHEN B ACKERMAN GEORGE O SAILE & ASSOCIATES28 DAVIS AVEPOUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12603-2408UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated CircuitsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 3, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 4, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 21, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 20, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 3, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 1, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance