USPTO serial 78476306
NATURE'S LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURE'S LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bingham B. Leverich
KATHLEEN T GALLAGHER-DUFF COVINGTON & BURLING1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bakery products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |