CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for STILE V

USPTO serial 78476615

STILE V

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223440Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STILE V?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana E. Stewart

DANA E STEWART GLOBAL TRADEMARKS INC505 S VILLA REAL DRIVESUITE 102ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, camisoles, combinations, corsets, girdles, lingerie, body suits made of linen, socks, stockings, slips, underclothing, underwear, uniformsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDApr 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2011C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 4, 2011CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 28, 2011CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 2010PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 25, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 15, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 13, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 13, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance