Drawing for STARR EXCESS INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 78476631

STARR EXCESS INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3027800Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2005
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARR EXCESS INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLAUDIA W. STANGLE

CLAUDIA W. STANGLE LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZASUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance underwriting services, namely, property and casualty insurance, directors' and officers' liability, errors and omissions liability, fiduciary liability, employee practices liability, and professional liability insuranceSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 30, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2007C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Feb 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 25, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Dec 11, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Dec 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance