Drawing for ATLANTA CHEESECAKE CAFE

USPTO serial 78476653

ATLANTA CHEESECAKE CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATLANTA CHEESECAKE CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason A. Bernstein

JASON A BERNSTEIN POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP191 PEACHTREE ST FL 16ATLANTA, GA 30303-1740UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029garden salads, soups and potato skinsACTIVE
030Cheesecakes, coffee, cookies, cakes, mousse cakes, bar cookies, brownies, savory cheesecake, and quiche; hors d'oeuvres, namely, quiche, sweet and savory cheesecakes, cakes, mousse cakes and bar cookies; sandwichesACTIVE
043Restaurant and take-out restaurant servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 3, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 3, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 11, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 28, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 28, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Apr 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 15, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 15, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 14, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED
Oct 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance