USPTO serial 78477134
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Mulcahy
ROBERT W MULCAHY LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT MULCAHY2881 SCOTT BLVDPO BOX 58039 - MS/2061SANTA CLARA, CA 95050-2549| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Maintenance and Repair of Semiconductor Processing and Production Equipment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |