Drawing for CHAMBER MAINTENANCE WAFER

USPTO serial 78477134

CHAMBER MAINTENANCE WAFER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHAMBER MAINTENANCE WAFER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Mulcahy

ROBERT W MULCAHY LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT MULCAHY2881 SCOTT BLVDPO BOX 58039 - MS/2061SANTA CLARA, CA 95050-2549

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Maintenance and Repair of Semiconductor Processing and Production EquipmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 24, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 24, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 5, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 20, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 10, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
May 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance