USPTO serial 78477150
ILT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY J. NELSON
GARY J NELSON CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE LLP350 W COLORADO BLVD STE 500PASADENA, CA 91105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC SENSORS FOR TRACKING AND CONTROL OF INVENTORY; RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) SENSORS FOR TRACKING AND CONTROL OF INVENTORY; ELECTRONICALLY AND MAGNETICALLY ENCODED LABELS, TAGS AND DETECTORS WITH BUILT-IN INDICATORS FOR USE IN INVENTORY TRACKING AND CONTROL; CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL SENSORS FOR DETECTING THE FRESHNESS OF FOOD PRODUCTS; CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL SENSORS; NAMELY, ENCODED LABELS, TAGS AND DETECTORS THAT ARE CHEMICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY RESPONSIVE THAT MEASURE THE FRESHNESS OF FOOD PRODUCTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | PAPER LABELS AND TAGS THAT ARE ELECTRONICALLY RESPONSIVE FOR TRACKING AND CONTROL OF INVENTORY; PAPER LABELS AND TAGS THAT ARE CHEMICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY RESPONSIVE FOR MEASURING THE FRESHNESS OF FOOD PRODUCTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |