Drawing for INSIDE THE MUSIC BUSINESS

USPTO serial 78477159

INSIDE THE MUSIC BUSINESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSIDE THE MUSIC BUSINESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin H. Fabrikant, Esq.

KEVIN H FABRIKANT ESQ LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN H FABRIKANT12000 BISCAYNE BLVD STE 609NORTH MIAMI, FL 33181-2727UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Series of prerecorded audio recordings, namely, compact discs, compact disc ROM, audio discs, miniature audio discs, audio cassettes, digital audio tapes,on-line Internet streaming musical and voice recordings, downloadable musical sound recordings, downloadable video musical recordings, downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines in the field of music, and audio transmission all featuring music, arbitrary sounds and spoken wordsACTIVEAug 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Oct 31, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Oct 9, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED
Oct 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance