Drawing for CHROMAGENICS

USPTO serial 78477291

CHROMAGENICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHROMAGENICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Preparing statistics, systemization of information and management of databases, particularly relating to biotechnology and medical care; business consulting relating to biotechnology, medical diagnostics and gene therapyACTIVE
042Surveys and consultation in the field of biotechnology; services of bloengineers and biochemists; biological, biomedical and biotechnological research; laboratory services in the fields of biotechnology, biology, biochemistry, biostatistics, bio medics and recombinant expressions of nucleic acids; biotechnological, biochemical, biological, biomedical and bio statistical research and development in the field of pharmacology, medical care and bioengineering, particularly relating to the genetic basis of human diseases and related to genetic modification of plants and animalsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 3, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 23, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 21, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jun 21, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 31, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 31, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 8, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance