USPTO serial 78477291
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
2333 CN Leiden, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Preparing statistics, systemization of information and management of databases, particularly relating to biotechnology and medical care; business consulting relating to biotechnology, medical diagnostics and gene therapy | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Surveys and consultation in the field of biotechnology; services of bloengineers and biochemists; biological, biomedical and biotechnological research; laboratory services in the fields of biotechnology, biology, biochemistry, biostatistics, bio medics and recombinant expressions of nucleic acids; biotechnological, biochemical, biological, biomedical and bio statistical research and development in the field of pharmacology, medical care and bioengineering, particularly relating to the genetic basis of human diseases and related to genetic modification of plants and animals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |