CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for 2ND WIND

USPTO serial 78477425

2ND WIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 2ND WIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Meal replacement chews and bars with herbs; drink mixes with herbs for use as a meal replacementACTIVE—
029Protein-based, nutrient-dense snack chews and bars with herbs; Fruit-based snack foods with herbsACTIVE—
030Cereal based snack food with herbsACTIVE—
032Drink mixes containing herbs, namely, concentrates, syrups, or powders used in the preparation of energy drinks and sports drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 29, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 29, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 29, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 17, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 10, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 31, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance