USPTO serial 78477486
I-DEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I-DEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. PETER HOCHBERG
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPA1940 E 6TH ST 6TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys and games, namely, board games; card games; dice games; games of skill and chance; video games; checker games; chess games; toy vehicles, trains, airplanes, helicopters and boats; tops; wagons; dolls, doll clothing, doll accessories, doll houses and doll house furnishings; toy animals, namely, rubber, plastic and stuffed; puzzles namely jigsaw, plastic and three-dimensional puzzles; bicycles; badminton rackets, tennis rackets and squash rackets; construction and building toys; dart boards; darts; doll carriages and strollers; beach toys namely, squeezable squeaking, soft sculpture, inflatable bath and water squirting toys; craft kits and art and hobby kits containing beads, fabrics, stencils, stickers, coloring books and pads, glue, toy jewellery, fabric paints; toy action figures and accessories therefor; ride-on toys; toy armour; toy boxes and chests; toy figures; toy gliders; toy guns; toy holsters; toy hoop sets; toy mobiles; toy model hobby craft kits; toy modelling dough; toy pistols; toy putty; toy rockets; toy snow globes; toy stamps; toy swords; toy watches; toy weapons; baby and children's multiple activity toys; bath and bathtub toys; infant action crib toys; inflatable ride-on toys; non-riding transportation toys; party favours in the nature of small toys; plush toys; soft sculpture toys; squeezable squeaking toys; stuffed toys; water squirting toys; wind-up walking toys; wind-up toys; equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; hand held unit for playing electronic games; hand held unit for playing videogames; paddle ball games; pinball games; role playing games; table tennis games; drawing toys; multiple activity toys and art activity toys; kicking toys; electronic educational games; electronic arcade-like electronic videogames; travel games, namely, backgammon, chess, checkers, and other travel size skill games; table top hockey games; strategy games; viewing toys and picture cards and reels therefor; toy balls; toy woodworking tools; outdoor games namely volleyball sets, badminton sets, tether ball sets, horse shoe sets, bocce sets, croquet sets, paddle ball sets; action games, namely, action skill games; toy construction sets; toy robots; table top action games; toy road racing sets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |