USPTO serial 78477850
RING OF HARMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3814529Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2010
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RING OF HARMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burnaby, BC, CA
Burnaby, BC, CA
Burnaby, BC, CA
Burnaby, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
DOUGLAS T. JOHNSON MILLER & MARTIN PLLC832 GEORGIA AVENUESUITE 1000 VOLUNTEER BUILDINGCHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamin enriched water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURELAND PRODUCTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURELAND PRODUCTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURELAND PRODUCTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Natureland Bio Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named RING OF HARMONY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |