Drawing for HEPLEX

USPTO serial 78478449

HEPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3343762Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 27, 2007
Examiner
HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with HEPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael N. Spink

Michael N. Spink BRINKS GILSON & LIONE524 South Main Street, Suite 200Ann Arbor, MI 48104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vibration absorbers and shock absorbers in particular hydraulic, hydropneumatic and mechanic vibration absorbers, friction absorbers, rotation absorbers, wing absorbers, telescope absorbers, lever absorbers and lamella absorbers; suspension systems, spring elements and springs, in particular hydraulic, hydropneumatic and mechanic suspension systems, spring elements and springs; all the aforementioned goods being custom manufactured for air and water vehicles and heavy-duty, land vehicles not for passenger transportationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Oct 26, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 26, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 26, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2014C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 23, 2014E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 9, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 6, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jul 24, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 24, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 24, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 23, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 16, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 16, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jul 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 12, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Nov 7, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance