USPTO serial 78478486
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis J. Duffin
Francis J. Duffin Wiggin and Dana LLPP.O. Box 1832One Century TowerNew Haven, CT 06508-1832| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | HEALTHCARE CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC PROCESSING OF HEALTH CARE INFORMATION; DISASTER RECOVERY SERVICES, NAMELY, BUSINESS PLANNING AND BUSINESS CONTINUITY CONSULTING; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES FOR HOSPITALS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; CONSULTATION SERVICES TO MEASURE, COLLECT, ANALYZE AND REPORT OUTCOME DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2004 |
| 038 | INFORMATION TRANSMISSION VIA ELECTRONIC NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2004 |
| 042 | COMPUTERIZED AND INTERNET BASED TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY NAMELY PROVIDING ACCESS TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMPREHENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, THE IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF COMPUTERIZED PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY SYSTEMS, CARDIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS, DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, EMERGENCY ROOM TRACKING SYSTEMS, ELECTRONIC PRESCRIPTION SERVICES, LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEMS, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION INTERDISCIPLINARY CHARTING SYSTEMS, PATIENT-BASED PROBLEM LISTS, PHARMACY INFORMATION SYSTEMS, RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS, RESULTS REPORTING AND SCHEDULING AND PATIENT REGISTRATION SYSTEMS; DATA AUTOMATION AND COLLECTION SERVICE USING PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE TO EVALUATE, ANALYZE AND COLLECT SERVICE DATA FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION, INTEGRATION, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF GENERAL HOSPITAL FINANCE SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS, HUMAN RESOURCES AND PAYROLL SYSTEMS, REVENUE CYCLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; COMPUTER DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING; INTERNET PORTAL DESIGN SERVICES, HOSTING OF DIGITAL CONTENT ON THE INTERNET; MEDICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD MEDICAL OUTCOMES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |