Drawing for THE GLOBAL GOURMET

USPTO serial 78478496

THE GLOBAL GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GLOBAL GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eugene E. Renz, Jr.

EUGENE E RENZ JR EUGENE E RENZ, JR PC205 N MONROE STMEDIA, PA 19063-9056UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029all natural meat productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 14, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 1, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 31, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 29, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Oct 29, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Oct 29, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 30, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 10, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 10, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 10, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance