USPTO serial 78479699
INSYTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSYTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Hoffman
KATHERINE M HOFFMAN LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS600 W BROADWAY STE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3372UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video asset management software program to capture, display, annotate, store, transmit, and retrieve video data, and create derivative video data, locally and across networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |