USPTO serial 78479942
ATOMIC BETTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATOMIC BETTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Alarm clocks; ankle bracelets; beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry; bracelets; bracelets of precious metals; brooches; charms; chokers; chronographs for use as watches; clip earrings; clocks; cloisonne pins; costume jewelry; cuff-links; ear clips; earrings; hat ornaments of precious metal; hat pins of precious metal; holiday ornaments of precious metal not used as tree ornaments; jewelry identification bracelets; jewelry; jewelry chains; jewelry pins for use on hats, jewelry, namely, amulets; key rings of precious metal; neck chains; necklaces; ornamental lapel pins; ornamental pins; pendants; pendulum clocks; pocket watches; rings being jewelry; stop watches; tiaras; tie clips; tie fasteners; tie pins; tie tacks; wall clocks; watch bands; watches; watches containing an electronic game function; watches containing a game function; wrist watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; all purpose athletic bags, athletic bags; bags and holdalls for sports clothing; change purses; coin purses; sports bags; sports packs | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bath linen; bed sheets; bed spreads; blanket throws; comforters; duvet covers; eiderdown covers, eiderdowns; household linen, kitchen linens, linen, mattress covers; pillow cases; pillow covers; pillow shams; table linen | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Anklet socks; bathrobes; Bermuda shorts; boxer briefs; boxer shorts; brassieres; underwear briefs; bustiers; camisoles; children's cloth eating bibs; hosiery; night gowns; pajamas; panties, sandals, children's and junior's sport shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atomic Cartoons Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Atomic Cartoons Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ATOMIC BETTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |