USPTO serial 78480016
INTEGRADESK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRADESK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
ADRIENNE L WHITE WHITE, REDWAY & BROWN LLP1217 KING STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2926UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; data carriers namely, wire and cabling; computers and computer peripheral devices; data processors and microprocessors; memory storage namely optical, data and memory storage cards, and hard drives for data storage; thin client disc-less computers; computer servers; computer software namely graphical user interfaces; HCI (human-computer interactional) software; data transport software; loading balancing (management of data); data flow management software; wireless apparatus namely wireless routers, wireless hubs, network cards and wireless apparatus for IT; portable and wireless telephones, wireless pages and radio modules; audio and video apparatus and instruments, namely compact disc players, compact discs players with radios, compact discs players with cassette players and/or cassette recorders, radios, radio cassette players, digital video disc recorders and players, video compact disc recorders and players, mini disc recorders and players, MP3 recorders and players, web cams; portable data storage; computer printers; computer keyboards; teaching apparatus and instruments namely overhead projectors, televisions and LCD projectors; smart boards (white boards) being computer-teaching interfaces; parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Manuals for computers programs; periodicals; printed instructional and teaching material namely computer-based learning software and hard-copy manuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture; office furniture; furniture for schools; work stations (furniture); parts for all the aforesaid goods including doors, panels, end pieces, fronts, backs, drawers and cupboards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |