USPTO serial 78480158
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING, NY 10562UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; housewares, namely, candleholders made of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | Music boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Stationery; leather goods, namely, leather-covered address books | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | bags, namely luggage; leather and imitation leather goods, namely wallets, key chains, credit card cases, backpacks, briefcases, key cases, waist packs, luggage umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Housewares, namely, beverage glassware, pans, flower pots, vases, ceramic mugs, candleholders not made of precious metal, cookie jars, canister sets, bowls, plates, serving planers, towel holders; decorative housewares, namely, china and ceramic figurines | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Table and bed linens | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | gloves, ties, lingerie, loungewear, hosiery, socks, boxer shorts, bras, panties, camisoles, pajamas, nightgowns, fur hats, fur stoles, fur gloves, fur muffs, bandanas, belts, slippers, robes, headbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, plush toys, figures, namely, play figures, action figures, and toy figures, dolls | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |