Drawing for SAFE.  SIMPLE.  SURE.

USPTO serial 78480181

SAFE. SIMPLE. SURE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE. SIMPLE. SURE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marsha Stolt

MARSHA STOLT MOSS & BARNETT90 S 7TH ST STE 4800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003(Based on Intent to Use) Laundry and dish detergent, sanitizing all-purpose cleaners, and cleaning preparations in the nature of all-purpose cleansers for use in food processing, institutional laundry, ware washing, drain maintenance, and housekeepingACTIVE
021(Based on Intent to Use) Non-metal dispensers for detergents, sanitizing cleaners, and cleaning preparations used in industrial/institution laundry, ware washing, and housekeeping programsACTIVE
037(Based on Use in Commerce) Consulting services in connection with cleaning, sanitizing, disinfecting, and all-purpose cleaning and care of institutional/industrial laundry, ware washing, and housekeeping of buildings, clothing, and equipment used therewithACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 30, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance