USPTO serial 78480259
JUNIOR USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUNIOR USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHAIM RYBAK
CHAIM RYBAK SHIBOLETH LLP1 PENN PLZ STE 2527NEW YORK, NY 10119-2532UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Garments, namely ankle socks, anklets, anti-perspirant socks, athletic footwear, athletic shoes, athletic uniforms, baby bunting, baby doll pyjamas, balloon pants, bandanas, baseball caps, bathing suits, bathing suits for men, bathing trunks, beachwear, beanies, belts; belts of textile, belts made of leather, bermuda shorts, bikinis, blouses, bottoms, bowling shoes, boxer briefs, boxer shorts, briefs, camp shirts, caps, children's and infants' cloth bibs, children's cloth eating bibs, children's headwear, cloth bibs, cloth diapers, coats, coats for men and women, coats made of cotton, coats of denim, crop tops, denim jackets, denims, down jackets, dress shirts, dress suits, dresses, dressing gowns, dungarees, dust coats, dusters, ear muffs, evening dresses, evening gowns, fishermen's jackets, fishing vests, fleece pullovers, fleece shorts, flip flops, footwear, gloves, gowns, gym shorts, gym suits, hats, head scarves, head wear, headbands, heavy jackets, hoods, hosiery, housecoats, infant cloth diapers, infant and toddler one piece clothing, infant diaper covers, infants' shoes and boots, infants' trousers, infantwear, jackets, jeans, jerseys, jogging outfits, jogging pants, jogging suits, knickers, knit shirts, knitted caps, knitted underwear, ladies' suits, leather belts, leather coats, leather headwear, leather jackets, leather pants, long jackets, long sleeved vests, mantles, men's and women's jackets, coats, trousers, vests, men's socks, men's suits, women's suits, miniskirts, mittens, mock turtle-neck sweaters, mufflers, neckties, night shirts, one piece garment for infants and toddlers, open-necked shirts, over coats, overalls, overcoats, pajamas, pants, plastic baby bibs, polo shirts, ponchos, pullovers, rain coats, robes, rugby tops, sandals, school uniforms, shirts, shirts for suits, shoes, shorts, short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts, short-sleeved shirts, ski jackets, skirt suits, skirts, skirts and dresses, slacks, sleepwear, sleeved or sleeveless jackets, slippers, small hats, sneakers, socks, sport coats, sport shirts, sports jackets, sports overuniforms, sports shirts, suits, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, sweat suits, sweaters, sweatsocks, swim wear, swimsuits, tank tops, ties, trousers, trunks, turtlenecks, tuxedos, t-shirts, underclothes, undergarments, underpants, undershirts, underwear, uniforms, v-neck sweaters, windshirts, wind-jackets, and wristbands. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |