USPTO serial 78480354
ENPIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENPIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER D. VOGL, ESQ.
PETER D VOGL ESQ JONES DAY222 E 41ST STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RECORDED COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEM TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; RECORDED COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEM TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEM TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER NETWORK SYSTEM TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC MUSIC NAMELY DOWNLOADABLE RING TONES, AND MUSIC VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND WIRELESS DEVICES; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF BOOKS, NEWSPAPERS, STUDY BOOKS OR PAPERS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT; BLANK AUDIO-VIDEO DISCS, NAMELY CDS AND DVDS; PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS FEATURING MUSIC; COMPACT DISC PLAYERS; BLANK FLOPPY COMPUTER DISCS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY MICROPROCESSORS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER MEMORIES; MAGNETIC TAPE DRIVES; ELECTRONIC CONTROL PANELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |