Drawing for Serial No. 78480487

USPTO serial 78480487

Serial No. 78480487

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78480487?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William O. Ferron, Jr.

William O. Ferron, Jr. Seed IP Law Group PLLC701 Fifth AvenueSuite 5400Seattle, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009operating system softwareACTIVEJul 2, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 28, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 28, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 18, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Sep 10, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jul 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 12, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 12, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 12, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 15, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION
May 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance