USPTO serial 78480772
SIMFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2006
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIMFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Gwent, GB
Other trademarks owned by Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Gwent, GB
Other trademarks owned by Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Gwent, GB
Other trademarks owned by Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
JILL ANDERFUREN MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP6300 SEARS TWR 233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Manually operated valves made wholly or principally of metal; manually operated valves made wholly or principally of metal and plastic material; and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods; all of the foregoing not for use in the oil and gas industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Valves being parts of pharmaceutical production processing equipment, for regulating fluid flow, and parts and fittings therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Valves made wholly or principally of plastics, not being machine parts, and parts and fittings therefor; all of the foregoing not for use in the oil and gas industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alfa Laval Biokinetics Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Alfa Laval Biokinetics Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Alfa Laval Biokinetics Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named SIMFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 2, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ATAP | AMENDMENT APPROVED BY ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |