USPTO serial 78481085
MEYER COMMERCIALWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEYER COMMERCIALWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Compagno
John M. Compagno Meyer Corporation, U.S.1 Meyer PlazaVallejo, CA 94590UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | parers, steak knives, utility knives, boning knives, vegetable slicers, pizza cutters, pizza slicers, cheese slicers (non-electric) bread knives, chef knives, santoku knives, kitchen shears, and knife sharpeners; non-electric kitchen gadgets, namely lemon zesters, apple corers, swivel peelers, can openers, and meat tenderizer mallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | measuring spoons, measuring cups | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | electric cooking devices, namely saute pans, fry pans, woks, griddles, waffle irons, coffee pots, tea kettles, stock pots, fondue pots, toasters, electric vertical roasters, and electric roasters with and without racks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | kitchen tools, namely turners, spatulas, slotted spoons, solid spoons, basting spoons, mixing spoons, skimmers, ladles, mixing forks, pasta forks, forged forks, chefs forks, serving forks, whisks, mashers and tongs; kitchen gadgets, namely melon ballers, coffee scoops, cookie cutters, non-electric cookie guns, pastry brushes, cheese slicers, bottle openers, ice cream scoops, hand graters, garlic presses, and corkscrews; metal and ceramic bakeware, ovenware and serveware, namely cookie pans, vertical roasting pans, tart pans, cake pans, muffin pans, pizza pans, fluted mold pans, casseroles, roasting pans with and without racks; decorative shape pans, lasagna pans, angel food cake pans, pie pans, bun pans, sheet pans, baking pans, and cooling racks; kitchen utensils and containers, namely colanders, mixing bowls, pails for wine cooling, wine carafes, pitchers, ramekins, ice buckets, soup tureens, roasting dishes, bowls, plates, cups, mugs, teapots not of precious metal, cream pitchers, sugar bowls not of precious, utensil crocks, non-electric coffee percolators, and tea kettles; metal cookware, namely stockpots, saucepans, saucepots, saute pans, sauteuse pans, windsor pans, chef pans, sauciers, dutch ovens, non-electric griddles, grill pans, brasiers, stir fry pans, non-electric woks, wok racks, fry pans, non-electric skillets, french skillets, lobster pots, au gratin pans, pasta pots, steamers, double boilers, multi-use pots, pasta inserts, namely colanders, steamer inserts, double boiler inserts, non-electric double burner griddles, pans for warming butter, non-electric pressure cookers, cutting boards, and knife blocks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MEYER COMMERCIALWARE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |