USPTO serial 78481549
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Intimate Beauty Corporation d/b/a Victoria's Secret Beauty
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Intimate Beauty Corporation d/b/a Victoria's Secret Beauty
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, INC.
REYNOLDS, OH
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Colucci
FRANK J COLUCCI COLUCCI & UMANS101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022-6000UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | silicone based polymers used in the manufacture of personal care products, namely, aftershave gels, aftershave lotion, antiperspirant, artificial nails, astringent for the face, astringent for the skin, bath beads, bath oil, bath salts, blush, body glitter, body mist, body oil, body scrub, body wash, bubble bath, cologne, cream for the body, cream for the cuticles, cream for the eyes, cream for the face, cream for the feet, cream for the hands, deodorants for personal use, essential oils for personal use, exfoliating preparations for the skin, eye gels, eye makeup pencils, eye masks, eye shadow, face highlighter, face masks, face mist, face scrub, non-medicated foot soaks, face toners, foundation, fragrant body splash, fragrant body mist, hair conditioner, hair dyes, hair glitter, hair highlighter, hair mascara, hair pomade, hair rinses, hair removing creams, hair shampoo, hair spray, hair straightener, hair styling gel, hair styling mousse, lotion for the body, lotion for the face, lotion for the feet, lotion for the hands, lip balm, lip gloss, lip liner, lip makeup pencils, lipstick, makeup for the body, makeup for the face, makeup remover, mascara, massage cream, massage lotion, massage oil, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail stencils, non-medicated blemish stick, non-medicated cleanser for the face, non-medicated foot spray, non-medicated massage ointment, oil blotting sheets for the skin, perfume, powder for the body, powder for the face, powder for the feet, pumice stones for personal use, salt scrubs for the skin, shaving cream, shaving gels, shower cream, shower gel, skin bronzing cream, soap for the body, soap for the face, soap for the hands, sun block for the body, sun block for the face, suntan lotion for the body, suntan lotion for the face, sunless tanning lotion for the body, sunless tanning lotion for the face, pre-suntanning lotion for the body, pre-suntanning lotion for the face, post-suntanning lotion for the body, post-suntanning lotion for the face and talcum powder | ACTIVE | Dec 27, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |