USPTO serial 78481571
SWIPE ME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWIPE ME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Zinna
Michael J. Zinna WARD & OLIVOSTE 305382 SPRINGFIELD AVESUMMIT, NJ 07901-2707Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital camera, digital cellular phone, barcode scanner, RFID device reader, and digital watermark reader for use in conjunction with printed matter which allows a user to access electronic or Internet-based information that is related to or that amplifies material contained in the printed matter; digital camera, digital cellular phone, barcode scanner, RFID device reader, and digital watermark reader for use in conjunction with jewelry, costume jewelry, imitation jewelry or clothing which allows a user to access electronic or Internet-based information that is related to or that amplifies material contained in jewelry, costume jewelry, imitation jewelry or clothing; digital camera, digital cellular phone, barcode scanner, RFID device reader, and digital watermark reader used to scan indicia from printed matter and send an electronic signal to a processor which then accesses or downloads information from the Internet; digital camera, digital cellular phone, barcode scanner, RFID device reader, and digital watermark reader used to scan indicia from jewelry, costume jewelry, imitation jewelry or clothing and send an electronic signal to a processor which then accesses or downloads information from the Internet; digital cellular phones; personal digital assistants; hand-held computer hardware; computer operations software for a transponder, radio frequency ID tag, and barcode for use in conjunction with printed matter which allows a user to access electronic or Internet-based information that is related to or that amplifies material contained in the printed matter; a transponder, radio frequency ID tag, and barcode for use in conjunction with printed matter which allows a user to access electronic or Internet-based information that is related to or that amplifies material contained in the printed matter; computer operations software for a transponder, radio frequency ID tag, or a barcode for use in conjunction with jewelry, costume jewelry, imitation jewelry or clothing which allows a user to access electronic or Internet-based information that is related to or that amplifies material contained in jewelry, costume jewelry, imitation jewelry or clothing; a transponder, radio frequency ID tag, or a barcode for use in conjunction with jewelry, costume jewelry, imitation jewelry or clothing which allows a user to access electronic or Internet-based information that is related to or that amplifies material contained in jewelry, costume jewelry, imitation jewelry or clothing | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | blank magazine paper containing an embedded transponder, radio frequency ID tag, or a barcode; newsprint containing an embedded transponder, radio frequency ID tag, or a barcode; blank telephone directory pages containing a radio transponder embedded therein; blank journal books containing an embedded transponder, radio frequency ID tag, or a barcode; posters, postcards, trading cards, comic books, stickers, decals | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, shirts, sweaters, jackets, skirts, pants, underwear, bras, hats, scarves, neckties, belts, footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SWIPE ME
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |