USPTO serial 78481929
ORLEEN DE CANNES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORLEEN DE CANNES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Essential oils for personal use, essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products, eau de perfume, liquid perfumes, perfumes, perfume oils, perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations, bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes, cosmetics, cosmetic cleansing creams, cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes, body and face concealer for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic creams, cosmetic creams for skin care, cosmetic oils, cosmetic oils for the epidermis, cosmetic preparations for skin renewal, cosmetic preparations for body care, cosmetic soaps, cosmetic sun protecting preparations, face creams for cosmetic use, foundation for cosmetic use, face lotion and cream, perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations, exfoliants for skin, body and face; non-medicated skin care preparations, non-medicated skin creams, skin clarifiers, skin cleansers, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing lotions, skin conditioners, skin creams, skin creams in liquid and solid form, skin lighteners, skin lightening creams, skin lotions, skin masks, skin moisturizers, skin moisturizer masks, skin soaps, skin toners, skin whitening creams, skin whitening preparations, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, hair conditioners, hair care creams, hair care lotions, hair care preparations, hair oils, hair rinses, shampoo and conditioner, hair shampoo, bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; body cream soaps, cosmetic soaps, cream soaps, disinfecting perfumed soaps, hand soaps, liquid soaps for hands, face and body; medicated soaps, perfumed soaps, skin soaps, soaps for whitening and lightening the skin, soaps for body care, compacts containing make-ups, eyes makeup, makeup foundations, makeup removing preparations, makeup pencils, makeup powders, makeup, makeup removers, make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams, make up removing milks | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |