USPTO serial 78482312
GOLIATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLIATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis C. Paul
MICHAEL I SLAPO COHEN TAUBER SPIEVACK & WAGNER LLP420 LEXINGTON AVE STE 2400NEW YORK, NY 10170UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Glass, ceramic and earthenware goods, namely, plates, bowls, cups, mugs, jugs, pitchers, vases; beverage glassware, namely, cups, jugs, mugs and drinking glasses; demitasse sets consisting of cups and saucers; sugar and creamer sets; infant cups; cookie jars; cookie cutters; cake molds and rings; non-electric coffee pots; lunch boxes, lunch pails, sports and water bottles; thermal insulated containers for food or beverages, insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans, canteens; ceramic, glass, china and porcelain figurines; decorative boxes made of porcelain or resin; wastepaper baskets; plastic buckets; paper plates, bowls and cups; combs and brushes; electric and non-electric toothbrushes, toothbrush holders; lotion dispensers, soap dispensers, soap dishes Glass, ceramic and earthenware goods, namely, plates, bowls, cups, mugs,jugs, pitchers, vases; beverage glassware, namely, cups, jugs, mugs and drinking glasses; demitasse sets consisting of cups and saucers; sugar and creamer sets comprised of sugar bowls and creamer pitchers not of precious metal; infant cups; cookie jars; cookie cutters; cake molds and rings; non-electric coffee pots not of precious metal; lunch boxes, lunch pails, sports and water bottles sold empty; thermal insulated containers for food or beverages, insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans, canteens;ceramic, glass, china and porcelain figurines; wastepaper baskets; plastic buckets; paper plates, bowls and cups; combs and hairbrushes; electric and non-electric toothbrushes, toothbrush holders; lotion dispensers, soap dispensers, soap dishes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |