Drawing for SPAMHIPPO

USPTO serial 78482318

SPAMHIPPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPAMHIPPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary R. Gleason

GARY R GLEASON FARBSTEIN & BLACKMAN411 BOREL AVE STE 425SAN MATEO, CA 94402-3518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downlodable computer programs for identifying and removing computer viruses and spam from e-mail communications and e-mail serversABANDONEDMay 9, 2002
042computer programming services for others, namely, creating and/or managing e-mail accounts in order to identify and remove computer viruses and spam from e-mailsABANDONEDMay 9, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Feb 24, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Feb 20, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Feb 4, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance