USPTO serial 78482568
GEN IV TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3281063Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2007
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GEN IV TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chester, OH
West Chester, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul F. Kilmer
PAUL F. KILMER HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWSTE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services and on-line electronic catalog store services featuring motion detectors, video goggles, electronic vehicle trackers, electronic infrared illuminators, and audio and video security, surveillance and conferencing cameras, lenses, video monitors, flat panel displays, video recorders, audio/video signal processors, video signal switchers, and power units, cigarette lighter adapters, DC/AC power adapters, parts and accessories therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |