Drawing for PIMPJUICE

USPTO serial 78482870

PIMPJUICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIMPJUICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amber E. Bass

2404 Northlake CourtIrving, TX 75038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, jeans, pants, sweaters, shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, blouses, blazers, skirts, tops, jackets, dresses, suits, caps, hats, scarves, coats, socks, shoes, boots, bandanas, men's and women's undergarments, belts, ties, swimwear, and active wear, namely, sweat pants, sweatshirts, warm-up suits, shirts, shorts, track pants, tights, jackets, caps, hats, socks, jerseys, tank tops, and leotardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 21, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 25, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Apr 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2009UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 21, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 3, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance