USPTO serial 78482883
SEXY LITTLE THING, SEXY LITTLE THINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEXY LITTLE THING, SEXY LITTLE THINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Bostany
JOHN P BOSTANY THE BOSTANY LAW FIRM40 WALL STREET61ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, undergarments and lingerie | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Menashe, Ronit
- Other trademarks owned by Menashe, Ronit
- Other trademarks owned by Quock, Audrey
- Other trademarks owned by Quock, Audrey
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SEXY LITTLE THING, SEXY LITTLE THINGS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |