USPTO serial 78484006
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Langley, British Columbia, CA
White Rock, BC, CA
Langley, British Columbia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dean A. Palmer
Dean A. Palmer Dean Palmer IP Law & IProperty Inc.609 West Hastings Street, Suite 950Vancouver British Columbia V6B 4W4Canada,| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicated shampoos for pets, medicated grooming preparations for pets, pet feed supplements, herbal anti-itch and sore skin ointments for pets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 6, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |