CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CALIFORNIA NATIONS INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION

USPTO serial 78484114

CALIFORNIA NATIONS INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3339248Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CALIFORNIA NATIONS INDIAN GAMING ASSOCIATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theresa W. Middlebrook

Theresa W. Middlebrook HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP400 South Hope Street, 8th FloorLOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Association services, in the nature of a nonprofit organization comprised of California federally-recognized tribal governments, for planning and coordinating legislative policy, legal and communications efforts on behalf of its members, providing a forum for information and resources for the purposes of protecting the sovereign right of Indian tribes to have gaming on federally-recognized Indian landsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 26, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2018CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 20, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 30, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 19, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance