CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IBAR MYRTLE BEACH

USPTO serial 78484129

IBAR MYRTLE BEACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IBAR MYRTLE BEACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sara A. Centioni

Sara A. Centioni Nexsen Pruet, LLCP.O Drawer 2426Columbia, SC 29202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper goods, namely, printed menus, posters; printed matter, namely, cardboard floor displays for merchandising products and advertising signs of paper or cardboardACTIVE—
021Housewares, namely, plastic cups, paper cups, drinking glasses, and dishesACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, tank tops, sweat shirts, hats, and staff uniformsACTIVE—
043Hotels and restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 19, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2008INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance