CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TECHNICAL DILUTION

USPTO serial 78484275

TECHNICAL DILUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3412675Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 15, 2008
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TECHNICAL DILUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Haenel

David Haenel MARKMONITOR391 N. Ancestor Place, ste 150Boise, ID 83704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation in the field of preventing, impeding and shutting-down websites engaged in phishing and Internet fraudSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 7, 2007
042Computer services, namely, technically limiting the number of consumers who can connect to fraudulent websites to provide personal informationSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 7, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 26, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 11, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 9, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 6, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 6, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 23, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 6, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance