Drawing for HOT BODIES

USPTO serial 78484338

HOT BODIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOT BODIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, namely, radio controlled model vehicles, and kits and parts for the sameACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 2, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 29, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 24, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 24, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 30, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 30, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 29, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 15, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 15, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 31, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance