USPTO serial 78484389
EYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3399397Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2008
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pyrmont, NSW, AU
Pyrmont, NSW, AU
North Sydney, NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gretchen McCord Hoffmann
GRETCHEN MCCORD HOFFMAN, CIPP WONG, CABELLO, LUTSCH, RUTHERFORD ET ALCHASE TOWER, 221 W. 6TH STREETSUITE 950AUSTIN, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through the use of billboard, digital signage advertising networks and online advertising on interactive computer communication networks, out-of-home/outdoor advertising; advertising via light boxes, on street furniture and at point of sale; updating and dissemination of advertising material; rental of advertising spacex *.* [; marketing research; development of marketing strategies, concepts and material in the advertising field] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 3, 2006 |
| 042 | computer software design and maintenance; graphic design of multimedia presentations and advertising campaigns; graphic design of advertising material | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 3, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eye Corp Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Eye Corp Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Eye Corp Pty Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EYE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |