Drawing for KAUAI

USPTO serial 78486864

KAUAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAUAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. McKie

John E. McKie LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2592UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; fruit based snack foods; vegetable salads, garden salads and fruit saladsACTIVE
030Sandwiches; macaroni, pasta and rice salads; salad dressingACTIVE
032Mineral waters; aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated beverages; soft drinks; non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making fruit drinks; smoothiesACTIVE
043Catering services; restaurants, cafeterias, canteen services, snack bars; restaurant services for the immediate consumption of food and beverages; carry-out restaurant servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 24, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 11, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 23, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 5, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 12, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jan 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 17, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Aug 21, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Mar 23, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 4, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 21, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance