USPTO serial 78487347
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK A LAW CORPORATION55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113-2327UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting sessions, classes and seminars in person and online in the fields of sales and marketing, customer relationships, public and private sector customer and account development and concerns, business acumen and personal and interpersonal skills, and individual and group tutoring, consultation and training provided in connection therewith; course materials in the nature of computer programs, text books, workbooks, lesson plans, example problems, case studies and business descriptions distributed for use in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |