USPTO serial 78489426
WAWEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2010
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WAWEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Cumbow
Robert C. Cumbow Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 300, Pier 70SEATTLE, WA 98121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Peanut butter; processed peanuts, namely, shelled peanuts and roasted peanuts; chocolate-flavored butter; chocolate nut butter; cocoa butter for food purposes; potato chips; candied fruits; candied nuts; processed almonds; processed nuts, namely, shelled nuts and roasted nuts ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, [ biscuits, cakes, ]candies, [ cookies, pastries, bakery products, ] chocolates; chocolate filled and chocolate coated products, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate candies [, chocolate chips, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars, chocolate pastes, chocolate topping; cocoa; cocoa beverages with milk ] ; cocoa candies; [ cocoa mixes; cocoa spreads; ] cocoa-based ingredients in confectionery products; [ prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; ice cream; ice cream drinks; ice cream cakes; frozen yogurt; puddings; bakery desserts; wafers; halvah; ] fruit jellies [ ; peanut butter confectionery chips; beverages made of coffee; coffee-based beverages with milk ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Retail store services featuring confectionery products; retail online store services featuring confectionery products; mail order store services featuring confectionery products; wholesale distributorship featuring confectionery products ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Research for others in the field of food and confectionery products; technical assistance and advice for others regarding food research and confectionary food research ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wawel S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Wawel S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Wawel S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WAWEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 12, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 8, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |